The questions hitting my inbox right now are not new.
“Is this the worst market you’ve seen?” “Should I be worried about the NAR changes?” “Do you think rates are going to kill the next two years?”
I’ve heard versions of these questions through 2008, through COVID, through every rate spike and inventory swing in between. And the honest answer is the same every time: market conditions are rarely what decides who survives. Behavior does. Most agents find out the hard way they built something that only works when conditions cooperate.
The Pattern Doesn’t Change, Only the Cycle Does
In 2008, the agents who exited weren’t outcompeted. They self-selected out. When volume dropped, they went quiet. Stopped farming. Stopped calling. Waited for the market to signal it was safe to start again. That signal never came at the right time, and the pipeline they should have been building during the slowdown was gone by the time they needed it.
The agents who closed two to three times more deals than their peers that year weren’t working a different market. They were working the same one, without stopping.
COVID looked different on the surface. Fast moves, low rates, compressed timelines. But the agents who came out of that cycle with real staying power weren’t the ones who rode the frenzy. They were the ones whose clients called them first because they’d been in consistent contact during the quiet years before it. Relationships that were warm before the market heated up converted at a rate that cold outreach never could.
Post-NAR, the filter is running again. Agents who disclosed commissions early, adapted quickly, and had genuine client relationships held 90% retention. Transaction-only agents with no relationship infrastructure underneath the deal lost 25% of their clients to iBuyers and alternative models. Not because the rule change was fatal. Because there was nothing holding clients in place once the transaction dynamic shifted.
Different cycle. Same split.
What INtrepid Agents Actually Look Like
There’s a word I keep returning to: INtrepid. Steady under pressure. Not fearless, but not reactive.
INtrepid agents don’t perform differently based on market conditions. Their call volume looks the same in a slow quarter as it does in a hot one. Their farming doesn’t pause because inventory is tight. Their market update video goes out every week whether there’s meaningful news or not, because they understand that the video isn’t really about the market. It’s about being the agent their audience sees consistently, so when something does happen, they’re already trusted.
I had an agent on my team who barely flinched during the rate spike in 2022 and 2023. While agents around her were pulling back, she doubled her neighborhood mailers and kept her weekly call routine without adjusting for the mood of the market. She ended 2023 up year-over-year in a market where most agents were down 30%. Not because she had a strategy nobody else knew about. Because she didn’t stop when stopping felt justified.
Reactive agents look completely different. They go heavy on paid leads in booms and get crushed when cost-per-lead triples in volatility. They rely on referrals until a recession dries them up. Their activity level mirrors market conditions, which means their income does too.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Most agents don’t have a market problem. They have a dependency problem.
Dependency on one lead source. Dependency on favorable rates to activate buyers. Dependency on low inventory to make their listings feel urgent. Dependency on conditions being cooperative enough to make the business work.
When you build a business that functions only when the market is generous, every shift feels like a threat. Because it is one.
The anxiety a lot of agents are carrying right now isn’t really about rates or NAR or inventory. It’s the quiet recognition that their pipeline is thin, their farming is inconsistent, and their past client relationships are more transactional than they’d like to admit. That’s not a market problem. That’s a structural one. And the market shift just made it visible.
What the Business Actually Needs to Hold
The durable businesses I’ve watched survive multiple cycles share three things. Not a brand. Not a niche. Not a social media following.
Relationships that predate the transaction. Agents who run consistent personal touchpoints, not email blasts but actual calls and handwritten notes, generate roughly 28% of their business from repeat clients even in volatile years. That number holds because it isn’t dependent on market timing. It’s dependent on trust that was built before anyone needed to buy or sell.
A lead mix that doesn’t break when one channel softens. Sphere, farming, and organic content working in parallel. No single source owning more than 40% of the pipeline. This isn’t diversification for its own sake. It’s what keeps an agent in business when paid leads triple in cost or referrals dry up in a recession.
Geographic depth over scattered presence. One or two zip codes, worked consistently over years. The agents who farm the same neighborhoods for a decade capture 65% of proximity sellers that generalist agents never see. Not because of brand recognition. Because of repeated, physical presence that signals commitment to a specific community.
None of this is complicated. The hard part isn’t knowing it. The hard part is doing it without the market providing external motivation to keep going.
The Agent the Market Can’t Touch
The agents still standing after 2008, after COVID, after the last two years, are not the ones who had the best market. They’re the ones who stopped treating market conditions as the variable that determined their output.
They farmed during the crash. They stayed visible during the frenzy. They adapted to NAR changes without losing clients because the clients were never just transactional to begin with.
The market shifts. It always does. The agents who survive aren’t the ones who predicted the shift. They’re the ones who built something that didn’t require the market to be good in order to keep running.
❤️ Tiffany
Quick Links
NAR Research & Statistics, Inman News , RealTrends Agent Rankings Redfin Data Center
